Even old objects can still be part of the latest restore point.
Data which is moved is not accessible anymore for VBO.
#Veeam backup for office 365 user guide archive
The archive tiers do use other APIs than the “normal” object storage.
There is currently no built-in support in Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 for these kind of archive tiers and the native tiering policies must not be configured because Many object storage providers provide the possibility to configure tiering policies to move older objects from a high-cost/low-latency object storage to a low-cost/high-latency object storage, e.g. This is not supported and will break things. Do not setup tiering policies on the object storage side. Refer to the object storage provider and check security best practices for proper setup of containers/buckets. Object Storage Repository General security best practices apply - create an own storage user with own credentials for the bucket/container, apply restrictive ACL Also it scales much better than local Jet databases on the file system and such avoids performance issues. Today it already supports encryption and compression of objects, thus being more secure and space efficient than local Jet databases. Best Practice Notes Repository Type Use Object Storage Repositories whenever possible - either on-prem or cloud INFORMATION Click on the best practices title to view more details on each topic. In the latter case this can be on Direct Attached Storage (DAS), Storage Area Network (SAN) volumes or on a SMB3 Network Attached Storage (NAS) share. Repositories can either be Object Storage or Microsoft Jet database (. While a single proxy server can host multiple repositories, each repository is uniquely coupled with a single proxy server. With LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.Repositories are tightly coupled with proxy servers. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference Reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors. AvePoint Cloud Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Druva inSync, Metallic, Spanning SaaS Backup and Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup, whereas Veeam Backup for Office 365 is most compared with Acronis Backup, Dell EMC CloudBoost, Metallic, Carbonite Server and Veeam Backup & Replication. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup for Office 365 writes "This product takes care of hole in backing up Microsoft's flagship product, but the pricing model is bad". The top reviewer of AvePoint Cloud Backup writes "User-friendly, knowledgeable technical support, and the email backup features work well". AvePoint Cloud Backup is rated 9.0, while Veeam Backup for Office 365 is rated 8.0. It would be helpful if they could help us estimate storage or simplify the estimation portion." "The pricing model is unnecessarily confusing and could be simplified."ĪvePoint Cloud Backup is ranked 17th in Cloud Backup with 1 review while Veeam Backup for Office 365 is ranked 9th in Cloud Backup with 15 reviews. I need to make some estimates for customers in terms of how much storage will be needed on the cloud, and this is always tricky. This feature might get included in the next release." "The solution could offer better reporting." "Its price could be improved." "It's hard to predict the usage on the storage. However, for the other users who are on the local email server at that time, the solution is not able to capture the backup." "When you are working in the Cloud security is very important." "They can provide a dashboard for sizing. We have many users in management and approximately 50 other users who are using Office 365 of which Veeam is able to capture the backup. It should have a better user interface." "We have found that there is a limitation in this solution where it only takes the backup of users who are using Office 365 Enterprise email IDs. That's the main thing why it is not very user-friendly. It has a lot of scrolling and doesn't give you a complete overview when needed. Its user interface should be more user-friendly. It should have a better user interface for selecting what you want to back up so that you get a more clear overview of the sites that are there and the ones that you want to combine in a backup. You should see it immediately on the screen. For example, for the URL, you need to hover over the title or the name of the site. It works, but it is not always very clear. "When you add a new site for backup, it gives you a notice that there is a new site, but the way you select that and configure that could be slightly better.
0 kommentar(er)
